BPM Tips

Practical BPM tips for business process analysts and process managers

BPM Tips

Practical BPM tips for business process analysts and process managers

BPM Skills in 2026 (part 3)

One more part of the BPM Skills series is here!

I am very happy to share with you inspiring answers from three more experts. Below you can learn more about the role of process automation and customer experience in modern BPM and have a glimpse into the future!

As always, you can either read everything or use the navigation below. Enjoy!
Boris Krumrey
Clay Richardson
Steve Towers

Boris Krumrey

Boris Krumrey, the Global VP Automation Innovations at UiPath, is responsible for driving the UiPath Automation Innovation agenda to transform organisations with Agentic AI for customers and partners, showing the art of the possible with AI. Boris invented and runs the UiPath Innovation Labs, which he describes as the “Agentic Automation Kitchen” to inspire businesses exploring new customer and work experiences. In his initial role as Chief Robotics Officer at UiPath, he led the product roadmap and the integration design for RPA and AI technologies.

WWW: LI profile

1) How do AI and other trends impact the way organizations manage and run their processes?

AI is pushing organizations from “process flows” toward end-to-end work systems that combine deterministic orchestration + adaptive agentic work.

  • Deterministic orchestration remains essential for enterprise scale: clear execution semantics, auditability, predictable outcomes, and governance.
  • AI agents expand what can be automated beyond structured tasks into interpretation, drafting, summarization, classification, exception handling, and guidance under ambiguity. But more importantly depending on the selected model and context grounding capability AI agents expand to reasoning, planning, analysis and making decisions.
  • Multi-agent systems increasingly break linear process/case thinking: an orchestrating agent coordinates work while specialist agents handle different stages of a case and can reorder, revisit, or escalate steps based on context—more like humans managing real-world work.
  • This increases the need for an orchestration layer (e.g., UiPath Maestro) to keep adaptive behavior inside guardrails and measurable outcomes, rather than letting execution become freeform and hard to govern.
  • A parallel trend is “prompt-only workflows” (natural language specs in markdown, etc.). This can be useful for prototyping but often struggles in enterprises due to governance, auditability, scalability, and LLM cost/latency.

2) What are the skills, techniques, behaviors, and attitudes that can help BPM practitioners create value for their organizations in 2026?

Core BPM skills stay relevant—but the role expands. In 2026, BPM value comes from combining process discipline with agentic capability and operational reliability.

Skills & techniques

  • Agentic design fundamentals: defining agent goals and constraints, choosing tools, designing grounding/context (RAG) plus memory, guardrails rules, setting confidence thresholds and escalation rules, and evaluating outputs.
  • Orchestration-first thinking: designing for exception paths, retries, compensations, human-in-the-loop approvals, and evidence/auditability.
  • Multi-agent and adaptive case patterns: understanding how orchestrating agents coordinate specialized agents across case stages.
  • Case management / CMMN-style thinking: modeling non-linear, event-driven, situational work that doesn’t fit a strict flow.
  • BPMN as execution backbone: BPMN remains important in enterprise automation; it provides a deterministic, inspectable model.

Behaviors & attitudes

  • Prototype quickly, operationalize deliberately: experiment fast but insist on governance, observability, and measurement before scaling.
  • Outcome orientation: prioritize measurable business impact over perfect modeling artifacts.
  • Governance-by-design mindset: treat safety, compliance, and accountability as design inputs, not after-the-fact additions.

Important forward-looking point: to model agentic work better, BPMN likely needs to evolve (or be extended) with an “Agentic Task” concept that visualizes what’s inside the agent step: allowed tools, grounding sources plus memory, guardrail rules and internal decisioning/escalation gates.

3) What are the best resources to learn those skills?

UiPath resources (hands-on, enterprise-relevant)

Broader BPM resources

Well, this community would know best 😉

4) Which skills are no longer relevant or not practically applicable yet (hype)?

A few things to be cautious about:

  • “Prompt-only BPM” / fully freeform agent execution as the default: great for
    experimentation, often not enterprise-ready for governance, auditability, predictability,
    and cost/latency at scale.
  • Fully autonomous agents for core regulated processes: still more aspiration than
    default; hybrid patterns (deterministic backbone + bounded agentic tasks) will
    dominate.
  • DMN as the universal answer for decisioning: DMN won’t disappear, but in many
    cases decisioning becomes hybrid—rules where precision matters, agents/AI where
    judgment under ambiguity is needed. So DMN may be used more selectively or in
    combination.
  • Notation purity without operationalization: focusing on diagram perfection while
    ignoring execution reliability, exceptions, evidence, and measurement is increasingly
    unhelpful.

Jump to the top

Clay Richardson

Clay Richardson is the Chief eXcelerator at Digital FastForward. Through his advisory firm, he partners with enterprise leaders to reposition automation and AI platforms as strategic growth engines. He previously served as an analyst at Forrester Research, where he helped shape how global enterprises adopt low-code and intelligent automation at scale. Today, he advises organizations on aligning platform investments with executive mandates, measurable ROI, and long-term operating impact.

WWW: LI profile

BPM Skills in the AI Era: A Field Briefing from 2028

By Clay Richardson
Founder, Digital FastForward
Former Forrester Analyst (BPM, Intelligent Automation, & Low-Code)
March 16, 2026 March 16, 2028

Intro

Given how quickly things are accelerating around AI, I decided to approach these questions from a different perspective.

Instead of answering through the lens of 2026, I’ve framed my responses below as a “Briefing from March 16, 2028”, looking back at how BPM skills actually evolved over 2026 and 2027. Based on the work I’m currently doing with clients across enterprise automation, workflow platforms, and solution design, many of the patterns shaping that future are already visible today.

Taking this lens makes it easier to separate practical guidance from hype, while also challenging BPM practitioners to move beyond BPM and into the AI era. During my time at Forrester, I pushed the industry to abandon the term BPM altogether, as it had become synonymous with long-running initiatives that failed to deliver sustained value.

What follows is not a prediction, but an open door to a different future — one that replaces BPM with a more direct and accountable practice: Value Acceleration.

1. How do AI and other trends impact the way organizations manage and run their processes?

From 2026 to 2027, most enterprises rushed into what later became known as the enterprise AI-slop era. Vibe-coding tools dramatically lowered the cost of transforming business operations. Some organizations used consumer platforms like v0, Cursor, and Claude Code, while others adopted enterprise-grade environments from vendors like Pega and ServiceNow.

This led to an explosion of AI-generated workflow applications. Most were built quickly and in silos, resulting in fragmented architectures and operational chaos. Systems that worked in isolation failed when deployed across the enterprise.

By late 2027, many of these efforts converged into AI-orchestrated work platforms coordinating systems-of-work across humans, agents, and autonomous endpoints. But the damage was already done — failed initiatives, fragmented architectures, and significant technical debt.

In response, organizations began dismantling traditional process improvement programs and replacing them with value-governance teams focused on prioritization and measurable outcomes aligned with business strategy.

One of the biggest surprises was that by mid-2027, many organizations temporarily paused new AI initiatives to reorganize around AI-accelerated value and AI-driven solution design.

At the same time, the separation between design and build collapsed. AI-native development environments allowed solution designers to move directly from concept to implementation, fundamentally reshaping the enterprise solution lifecycle.

2. What skills, techniques, behaviors, and attitudes help practitioners create value?

Looking back from 2028, traditional business analyst and business architect roles were among the first to disappear. Organizations no longer needed teams dedicated to documenting processes once AI could generate that documentation instantly.

What separated relevant practitioners from those left behind was not documentation expertise, but capabilities like facilitation, stakeholder alignment, influence, and systems thinking.

The most important shift was from design thinking to systems thinking. As enterprises deployed increasingly autonomous systems, leading practitioners developed a macro view of how humans, AI agents, platforms, and data operate together as a cohesive system.

This shift elevated the role of the solution designer, responsible for designing complete systems-of-work rather than individual processes. By 2027, a single solution designer working with AI-native tools could accomplish work that previously required teams of product managers, analysts, designers, and scrum masters.

3. What are the best resources to learn those skills?

Looking back from 2028, the most valuable skills were the ones AI couldn’t do — the ones that didn’t scale. As knowledge became fully democratized, the differentiator shifted from access to information to the ability to operate effectively in complex systems. This made many traditional learning paths — including certifications — far less relevant.
For practical and technical skills, practitioners relied on just-in-time learning. Tools like ChatGPT and Claude, along with embedded platform guidance, enabled real-time learning and application. This was paired with experiential learning, where practitioners built systems directly using AI-native development environments. Traditional process design training largely disappeared.

For non-scalable skills, practitioners turned to more immersive approaches. Many invested in high-performance coaching to develop clarity, energy, and influence, while others took acting and improvisation classes to improve adaptability in dynamic stakeholder environments.

At the same time, learning around mindset and trust became essential. Books like The Outward Mindset helped practitioners collaborate across systems and align stakeholders around shared outcomes. Systems thinking also became foundational, with sources like The Fifth Discipline shaping how practitioners understood systems-of-work.
In the end, the most valuable capabilities were tied to trust, value orientation, and systems-level thinking.

4. Which skills are no longer relevant or are hype?

Looking back from 2028, many of the skills and capabilities foundational to BPM did not translate into an AI-native world. The clearest example was manual process modeling and documentation, which became increasingly irrelevant as AI could generate and adapt workflows in real time.

Similarly, significant effort was spent developing skills around frameworks, notations, and methodologies that had limited impact on outcomes. Certifications persisted, but did little to prepare practitioners for dynamic, AI-driven systems.

Even categories like low-code and citizen development, once seen as the future, were effectively declared dead by mid-2026. As AI-native development matured, the distinction between “builder” and “non-builder” collapsed, making these categories — and their associated skills — largely irrelevant.

Perhaps the most important shift was the decline of skills focused on process optimization without value alignment. By 2028, organizations no longer prioritized localized automation efficiency improvements unless they were directly tied to business growth mandates.

What endured were skills that prioritized designing, orchestrating, and governing systems-of-work that deliver value.

The most relevant practitioners moved beyond process thinking toward systems thinking, value orientation, and enterprise orchestration.

The future did not belong to those who mastered process — it belonged to those who could govern value across systems.

Jump to the top

Steve Towers

With over 40 years of experience in the private and public sectors, Steve is one of the world’s top 30 global CX experts. His courses are peer-reviewed and ranked in the world’s Top Ten (2025). He has been recognized internationally in the CX, BPM, EA, and LSS domains.

He has been awarded the
> Global Top 30 Guru CX 2025
> Top 30 Guru CX 2024
> 12 Gurus to Follow 2024
> CX Network Top 50 CX Influencers 2024
> Global Guru in CX 2023
> Global Guru in CX 2022
> Top 50 Customer Experience Influencers 2021
> Top Global Guru in Customer Service 2021
> Global 200 CX Leader 2021
> Top 150 Global CX Thought Leaders 2020
> Top 30 Guru in 2020
> Global Customer Service Expert in 2019
> OPEX Global contributor of the year 2018
inducted into the
> Enterprise Architect World Hall of Fame in 2011
In 2007, at Gartner’s Annual Summit, he received the
> Lifetime Achievement Award for Contribution to Business.

Steve has demonstrated his leadership and influence as the visionary founder of the BP Group, the world’s first and largest network for BPM and CX specialists. He also serves on the steering committees of major corporations, advises global leadership teams, and is a respected start-up investor. He has been acknowledged as an inspirational speaker with several No. 1 Best-selling books.

Steve has a proven track record of success in helping businesses & people transform themselves. He is recognised as a sought-after visionary in leading global enterprises. He uses tried-and-tested approaches from the world’s top achievers to help you codify your success, happiness & future. With hundreds of excellent testimonials, Steve is the perfect person to help you solve your customers’ experience challenges, make them work, understand and plan for them, and succeed.

Specialties include: Board Advisor | Customer Experience | Business Process Management | Business Transformation | Operational Excellence | Digital Transformation | AI for profit | Lean Six Sigma | BPM | BPR | Outside-In | CEMMethod™

Steve lives with Penny, my wife of 40+ years, and family in the UK.

To kickstart your success, call Steve at +44 7429 518277 or visit him at http://www.stevetowers.com.

WWW: Website
WWW: LI profile

Which BPM skills will be hot in 2026? (Outside-In is the divider)

You’ve heard this story.

Office full of clever people.
Screen flipped to show process map.
Someone declares. “We just need to automate it.”
And then customer reality walks through the side door.
“I had to chase you”
“I had to repeat all of that information”
“How could this take three weeks?”

That’s when BPM chooses between staying in the weeds, or becoming a competitive performance discipline.

Because in 2026, hot BPM skills aren’t about fancy new diagramming techniques.

They’re about designing operations that actually deliver customer outcomes, at speed and scale, with control.
That’s why Outside-In is never been more relevant.
And why I keep coming back to the CEMMethod.
Not as another buzzword.
As the practical foundation that keeps improvement efforts from devolving into internal theatre…

2026: BPM matures (at last)

Automation is now the easiest thing. AI assistants abound. Low-code tools are ubiquitous.
That’s great…if your focus is replacing humans.
But most businesses aren’t just trying to automate away people.
They’re trying to create customer experiences that make buyers happy, drive loyalty, and encourage upsell.
As work gets automated from top to bottom, those who rely on manual effort will get crushed.
They’ll either automate like crazy…
Or they’ll fail to change.
Here’s the new game:
1) Outside-In process architecture (don’t redesign processes, design experiences)
2) Process knowledge (use data to understand current-state performance)
3) Simplify aggresively (design experiences with humans, bots, and AI working together)
…and more!

…but let’s reality check. In theory theory works but in practice theory fails.

I’ll walk you through three examples that bring new game skills to life.
…and one punchline on why BPM + Outside-In = everything coming together.
Ready?

1) Outside-In process architecture (experiences first, processes second)

Questions you ask as an Inside-Out designer:

  • “How do we run this department faster?”
  • “How do we serve this product more efficiently?”
  • “How do we automate this task?”

Questions you ask as an Outside-In designer:

  • “What experience are we trying to create for the customer, start-to-finish?”
  • “What is the Successful Customer Outcome?”

Example: insurance claims

The old way

One process force fits the customer experience.
Treatment goes from triage, to assessment, to repair, to payment.
The customer calls for an update. Rinse and repeat.
No single group owns the full experience.
Everybody focuses on their internal process.
The customer gets lost in the shuffle.

Solution: Outside-In design.

You might have multiple underlying processes internally.
But you design around one unifying claim experience.
And the internal workflows adapt to support it.
Compare that to the “customer experience” outlined above.
Faster? Sure.
Empathetic? Not exactly.
But here’s the thing.

Outside-In processes are not “softer”.

They are actually stronger.

Why? Control.

When you’re solving for the entire experience instead of your tiny process slice, you build complete ownership at the top.

  • Hiccups get the attention they deserve.
  • Customers aren’t handed off willy nilly.
  • This is a desired outcome at every interaction.

To put people first, you need supple experiences.
That means exception handling built into the fabric of how work gets done.

2) Process knowledge (stop guessing, start measuring whats-going-on-actually)

By 2026, workshops aren’t enough.
Sure, you can hold a meeting and decide what you “think” is happening.
But the best BPM teams use data from the actual execution environment to show what is really happening.

  • Delays.
  • Exceptions.
  • Rework loops.

Example: bank account onboarding

It feels like the credit check is the slow step.
Until you use process information to show where the pain is actually happening.
Customers are mailing in their documents…over and over.
They can’t read your instructions.
So they call, get clarification, and start all over again.
So you fix up the document request.
Simplify language, reduce ambiguity, clarify steps.
Then automate the steps that can’t be messed with.
Outside-In the secret sauce:
Elapsed and cycle time matters.
…but so does customer effort and experience predictability.
If you don’t know what your customers see, you don’t know the whole story.
So measure the process from their POV too.
Connect it back to your customer account health scores so you can act.

3) Orchestration (putting people, automation, and AI together without destroying reliability)

Holy automation, Batman.
2026 will not be framed as a battle of “BPM vs AI”.
Oh no.
BPM will become the control layer that enables AI to be safe, measurable, and scalable.

Example: contact centre
AI can write first draft replies.
Summarize customer calls for agents.
Rock your world.

But what happens if it starts autonomously triggering claims?
Escalations?
Shipping orders?
Suddenly your AI has multiplied your downstream errors by a factor of…
MACHINE SPEED.
When you’re designing processes that work WITH AI (and not merely for IT), reliability is king.
That means defining the process states.
Making decisions explicit.
Guiding AI to only do the predictable “messy middle”.
And letting people handle the high-risk exceptions.
Scales like nothing else.

4) Decision intelligence (making “why” auditable again)

As soon as AI enters the conversation…
CEOs and boards want to know one thing:
“Explain that decision to me.”
Get used to it.
That means decision modelling is about to become a red-hot skill.
Not fuzzy concepts of “policy”.
Clear definition of decision logic that can be tested, managed, improved.

Example: public sector service eligibility

Someone either gets approved or declined.
But when you’re dealing with people’s livelihoods, you need to be able to tell THEM why.
AI can help you sort documents.
Flag potential risk points.
Augment processing power.
…but the actual decision needs to be clear, logical, and above reproach.
Outside-In the secret sauce:
People chase you when they don’t understand the what and the why.
Stop failure demand from happening in the first place.

5) Process observability (management by fact, at scale)

Observability will shift from being a “nice to have” reporting feature…
To a foundational skillset.
Built into process design from day zero.
Not fancy dashboards hacked together after your app is finished.
Signals and metrics you can use to see process health.

  • Detect drift.
  • Catch failure modes.
  • Reduce rework.

Example: retail returns
“You improved handling time by 30%!”
…but customers are MORE irritated than ever.
Why? You only measured how fast your employees work.
“We’re expediting returns but no one is getting resolved.”
“They keep transferring me to another department.”
Don’t let this be you.
Measure what customers see.
Connect back to your service experience metrics.
That’s CEMMethod in action:
closing the loop between customer experience and process improvement.

6) Experience-led standardisation (only standardise where it helps)

Experience-led standardisation is the holy grail.
Standardise where consistency adds value.
Protect flexibility where the customer experience matters most.

Example: healthcare patient discharge
Yes, some things need to happen every-single-time.
…but not everything.
So you create a standard way of working that provides consistency.
But you bake in intentional flexibility for your agents to handle exceptions.
Throw away the pillowcases.
Corridor CPR doesn’t scale.
…but built-in flexibility does.

7) Change activation (because your workers gotta use it)

You know what doesn’t exist?
Processes that no one follows.
Upload your fancy new process to the SharePoint portal.
Or…
Guide your workers at the moments of truth,

  • right there in front of the customer,
  • on the device they’re already using.

I’ll let you guess which drives actual change.
– – –

Conclusion

When’s the last time you saw BPM done right?
Operations execute flawlessly.
…and customers complain about nightmarish experiences.
Don’t choose BPM as a SILOED activity.
Choose BPM + Outside-In thinking.
Connect your operational efforts to the front-line experience.
…and own the entire experience from end to end.
Like we just talked about.

Simple 10-skill checklist for 2026 BPM:

  1. Outside-In experience-to-process design
  2. Process mining & process intelligence
  3. Process observability (signals that drive behaviour, not vanity metrics)
  4. Orchestration design across people, bots, and AI
  5. Decision modelling & decision governance
  6. Exception management & “casey” thinking
  7. AI for BPM (because it helps…some. And sometimes it hurts.)
  8. Experience-led standardisation (when to standardize, when to flex)
  9. Change activation & adoption strategy
  10. Value storytelling (connecting process efforts to customer outcomes + the triple crown)

My new book “Everyone Loves Great CX – Your Customer Experience Playbook” is now available. We review the themes here and turn them into an Actionables.

Learn more here: https://bpgroup.org/everyoneloves

Jump to the top

BPM Skills in 2026 (part 3)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to top